<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tom B.'s Rambles &#187; Montoya</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/tag/montoya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brincefield.net/blog</link>
	<description>What is on my mind right now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<a href="http://www.brincefield.net/excess/macabregaseous.php" style="padding:0;margin:0;" rel="nofollow"></a>	<item>
		<title>I was wrong about the definition of bi-partisan</title>
		<link>http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/27/i-was-wrong-about-the-definition-of-bi-partisan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/27/i-was-wrong-about-the-definition-of-bi-partisan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom B.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montoya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brincefield.net/blog/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is part of my Ramblings on Politics&#187; At least according to the Republicans I have been seeing on the news programs today. On CNN earlier, and just now on Hardball on MSNBC, there were 2 Republican congressmen (Hey, media, where are the Democrats for balance?) talking about their meeting today with Obama on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><div class="hackadelic-series-info on-frontpage"><small>This post is part of my Ramblings on <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-2')" title="click to expand/collapse slider Politics">Politics&raquo;</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-2"></span></small></div><p>At least according to the Republicans I have been seeing on the news programs today. On CNN earlier, and just now on Hardball on MSNBC, there were 2 Republican congressmen (Hey, media, where are the Democrats for balance?) talking about their meeting today with Obama on the stimulus bill. They liked him a great deal. But not the stimulus bill.</p>
<blockquote><p>You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-366"></span></p>
<p>They were very effusive about Obama, and his real desire to be bi-partisan. The problems with the bill are all caused by the evil Democrats in the Congress. They refuse to listen or do things the way the Republicans think things should be done.</p>
<p>So apparently, bi-partisan means, &#8220;Do it my way.&#8221; I always thought it meant, listen to both sides, be willing to compromise in areas you can, don&#8217;t compromise on foundations of your ideology. You know, things like, putting in large amounts of tax cuts into a stimulus package, despite the fact that the last round didn&#8217;t really work very well and they are not a core of Democratic policy.</p>
<p>The Republicans on the news networks kept implying, strongly, that if it were not for the congressional Democrats, Obama would gladly give them all the tax cuts they want. And drop all that stupid spending to create jobs.</p>
<p>This does not appear to me to be the reality we are living in. The elections last year seemed a pretty clear indication that the citizens of the USA are not real happy with the way the Republicans ran things when they were in charge, and they wanted something different. And Obama is giving us different.</p>
<p>I have a feeling that a chap named Montoya could give the congressional Republicans a small hint, &#8220;You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.&#8221; On the other hand, I do not have much faith that they can take a hint.</p>
<div id="flaresmith" class="feedflare"><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TomBsRambles?i=http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/27/i-was-wrong-about-the-definition-of-bi-partisan/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div id="hackadelic-sliderNote-2" class="concealed">Some of my other Ramblings are in these posts.<ol><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2008/10/18/political-ramblings/">Political Ramblings</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2008/11/12/a-sad-failure-of-principles/">A Sad Failure of Principles?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2008/12/18/let-him-decide/">Let him decide...</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2008/12/19/minnesota-senate-race-is-slowly-coming-to-a-conclusion/">Minnesota Senate Race is slowly coming to a conclusion</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/02/incoming-senators/">Incoming Senators</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/08/how-can-obama-stand-it/">How can Obama stand it?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/09/franken-stealing-the-election/">Franken Stealing the Election?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/20/the-obama-era-starts/">The Obama Era Starts</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/23/a-week-of-politics/">A Week of Politics</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/26/the-change-we-need-from-obama/">The Change We Need from Obama</a></li><li>I was wrong about the definition of bi-partisan</li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/02/13/politics-strange/">Politics are strange.</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/02/17/jobs-gop/">Jobs and the GOP</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/02/25/jindal-didnt-go-over-so-well/">Jindal didn't go over so well</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/03/10/closing-arguments-on-the-way/">Closing arguments on the way</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/03/11/earmark-earmark-who-has-an-earmark/">Earmark, earmark, who has an earmark?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/03/13/some-bias-from-the-washington-post/">Some bias from the Washington Post</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/04/05/europe-on-obama/">Europe on Obama</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/08/04/healthcare-crisis/">Healthcare Crisis?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/08/31/open-letter-to-the-president/">Open Letter to the President</a></li></ol><span style="display: block; margin-top: 3px; font-size: 7px"><a href="http://hackadelic.com/solutions/wordpress/sliding-notes" title="Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.5">Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.5</a></span></div><!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END--><a href="http://www.brincefield.net/excess/macabregaseous.php" rel="nofollow" style="display:none;">store</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brincefield.net/blog/2009/01/27/i-was-wrong-about-the-definition-of-bi-partisan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<a href="http://www.brincefield.net/excess/macabregaseous.php" style="padding:0;margin:0;" rel="nofollow"><span style="display:none;">rss</span></a></channel>
</rss>

